It’s not often we have something to report on locally – I rely on Alan Cann to do that…B-) – but I am very pleased to be able to do so now.
Hot on the heels of another South African success in the fight against HIV and AIDS comes the news (from the UCT Monday Paper) that:
Prophylactic antiretrovirals could check HIV infection
Being there: UCT’s Assoc Prof Linda-Gail Bekker led the South African component of the six-country study on the prophylactic use of an antiretroviral tablet.
It’s a long way from being the final word in HIV prevention, but a major study involving UCT researchers and published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that the daily use of an antiretroviral tablet as a prophylactic could curb infection among those at high risk by nearly 44%.
The findings are based on an HIV-prevention trial conducted at 11 international sites in six countries (including the Desmond Tutu HIV Foundation [DTHF], associated with UCT’s Faculty of Health Sciences), from June 2007 to May 2010. The study, named the Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Initiative (iPrEx), looked at the prophylactic use – in other words, for people not infected with HIV – of a tablet that contains two widely-used HIV medications, emtricitabine and tenofovir (FTC/TDF).
Results showed that high-risk individuals – men and transgender women who have sex with men – who took the tablet experienced an average of 43.8% fewer HIV infections than those who received a placebo. In all, 64 HIV infections were recorded among the 1 248 study participants who received a placebo pill, while 36 HIV infections were recorded among the 1 251 participants who received the study drug.
The iPrEx study found that this pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) was more effective among those who reported taking the pill more regularly. Among participants who used the tablet on 50% or more of days, as measured by pill counts, bottle counts and self-reports, risk of HIV infection fell by 50.2%; while among those who used the pill on 90% or more of days, as determined by the same measures, the PrEP pill reduced infection risk by 72.8%.
“I think this is a very significant study in that what we have here is the first proof of concept that taking an antiretroviral prophylactically – in other words, taking it before exposure to HIV – would actually prevent HIV infection,” says UCT’s Associate Professor Linda-Gail Bekker, deputy director of the Desmond Tutu HIV Centre.
As the tablets (brand-named Truvada) are readily available, anyone can buy and use these. But Bekker is quick to point out that a lot of work still has to be done on the treatment, especially on its use outside of trial conditions. (For example, the tablet can affect renal and liver function, so participants’ kidneys and livers were monitored closely.)
Also, those recently infected and still developing antibodies to the HIV (ie seroconverting) are cautioned not to take the tablet, as it exposes the virus to two agents, upping the risk of building resistance to the treatment. “You may inadvertently affect or impact your chances of good treatment down the line,” says Bekker.
Naturally, high-incidence countries like South Africa will take plenty of interest in the study. But at around R400 for 30 tablets, this may not be the treatment to turn things around for the country.
“It is unlikely that we will be able to treat our way out of this epidemic,” said the DTHF in a statement. “We are going to have to find innovative, affordable and practical ways to stop the ongoing transmission of HIV.”
Fortunately, the study found that participants did not relax their use of safer-sex practices. On the contrary, self-reported HIV-risk behaviour decreased among participants, while condom use increased.
Professor Anna-Lise Williamson, of UCT’s Institute for Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine and a member of the South African AIDS Vaccine Initiative, welcomes the treatment as another valuable advance in curbing the spread of the disease, but remains cautious of the human-behaviour element. For one, she says, people have to recognise that they are at risk before they’ll commit to the tablet.
“But it gives people options, and the more options they have, perhaps they’ll find a prevention strategy that suits their lifestyles,” she says. “But in the long term, I still believe we need a vaccine to prevent HIV infection.”
Concerns about risk compensation – increases in risky behaviour prompted by decreases in perceived risk – will remain, says Bekker. For this, education will be essential.
Also, the tablet’s use as a prophylactic will have to be but one tool in an arsenal of measures.
“We’re going to have to layer different kinds of preventative strategies together to come up with foolproof prevention,” Bekker warns, “but it’s probably not going to be dependent on only one strategy.”
Amen. So we have – in order of increasing efficacy – an HIV candidate vaccine regime, a vaginal gel, and now pre-exposure prophylaxis. And if you combine them…?? Basically, an additive effect – except that the vaccine is not available…. Time to fast-track, people!!
ViroBlogy 